Stamp Duty On Trademark License Agreement In Maharashtra


According to a July 2020 report, the Tamil Nadu government will likely reduce stamp duty and registration fees for all leases older than 12 months. This is one of the conditions set by the World Bank for the financing of the Tamil Nadu Housing Sector Strengthening Programme. 5.2 In addition, any staff member may use these mislabeled instruments if he or she is aware of them. These confiscated instruments must be sent to the collector, who then determines the amount of tax and penalty, if any, to be paid on the collector. Any part of an instrument can also subject suo moto to an instrument of evaluation by the Collector u/s. 31. 2.4 Where a document is drawn up in such a way as to fall within the scope of more than one article of Annex I, it shall be imposed by the article which collects the highest amount of stamp duty. Parties to a license are free to choose the basis for calculating the license that meets their business requirements. The most common method is the indication of the royalty as a percentage of turnover and other methods include: tax identical to that of a rental instrument for the remaining term of the lease agreement. I am looking for stamp duty on the license agreement for patent licensing in Maharashtra. A person can create and design an improvement to an existing technology or function that improves the use or functionality of the technology. The new invention may result from an idea relating to the use of licensed intellectual property, or it may in fact be the result of a modification of that IP in order to achieve an improvement.

An “improvement” in IP licensing generally means a development in the field of licensed technology that improves the ease of use, functionality, efficiency, performance, or other features of the original IP. A license agreement should state what an improvement is and who owns that improvement and all IPs that relate to the same thing. The license agreement must also provide for intellectual property in the case of joint development. . to the petitioner to increase construction. Although the same thing was referred to as a “lease agreement”, it was in fact nothing more than a simple license and therefore would not be a stamp duty on the. The petitioner was informed in advance that all stamp duty had to be paid on the agreement concluded on 11.6.1987, the petitioner having paid the same. According to the petitioner, they were not paid. 6.10 crores was the highest and was accepted. Subsequently, on 11.6.1987, an agreement was concluded between the petitioner and the Kanpur Development Authority.

The document in question was executed on a stamp. An IP holder may give another person the right or authorization to manufacture, use or sell goods or goods that embody those IP or that are covered by that IP by means of a contractual license. . . .

Pin It